![]() In December 2011, both parties moved for summary judgement. The court denied that motion without prejudice on Apfinding that the parties should conduct further discovery. On January 14, 2011, the EEOC filed a motion for partial summary judgement. ![]() ![]() The EEOC argued that such caps were both a violation of the ADA and had the effect of discriminating against deaf and hard-of-hearing applicants. The EEOC alleged that Creative Networks LLC violated the ADA by failing to provide reasonable accommodations to deaf and hard of hearing job applicants through its policy of capping the money spent on accommodations for job training at $200. District Court for the District of Arizona against Creative Networks LLC under Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. On September 28, 2009, the EEOC filed a lawsuit in the U.S. The EEOC argued that such caps were both a viola…
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |